Course Syllabus
151 | Hermeneutics
Three Credits
Course begins 8/27/13; ends 12/13/12
Meeting times: Select Fridays throughout semester (12:00pm – 1:15pm)
- Understand the major hermeneutical issues that contemporary pastors face;
- Articulate the importance of hermeneutics for effective ministry;
- Recognize the presuppositions that Reformed pastors bring to the exegetical task;
- Trace the rise and fall of different hermeneutical trends throughout church history;
- Formulate the general rules to be observed in the Bible interpretation;
- Articulate what contribution types make to the meaning of a given text;
- Identify a method for isolating the authorial intent in each parable;
- Grasp the proper exegetical approach to the Song of Solomon;
- Analyze several contemporary approaches to hermeneutics;
- Recognize good applications of Scripture teaching;
- Use Logos Bible software to facilitate exegesis.
Read the readings; listen to the lectures, complete the worksheets.
35 hours
30% of final grade.
We will come together for seven seminars throughout the semester.
13 hours
10% of final grade.
4 hours
10% of final grade.
The Hermeneutics of Dispensationalism; Read Geisler first, then Poythress. How does Geisler’s system hold up under Poythress’ questions? Write an essay (2500 words) in which you accurately state the position that both men take and assess the arguments of both.
Geisler, Systematic Theology, chapter 13. (50 pgs)
Poythress, Understanding Dispensationalists, chapters 8-11 (20 pgs)
OR
The Emerging Church; Write a critical review (2500 words) of Rob Bell, Love Wins. As always in a critical essay, state the author’s position(s) and then assess. Be sure to make this a critique of the hermeneutic used. Skim the entire book but especially zero in on chapter 7.
20 hours
15% of final grade.
26 hours
15% of final grade.
- Read Fairbairn’s introduction to the issue (p. 390-393). In your own words, state the issue/problem that makes these texts a challenge for a hermeneutic with evangelical presuppositions.
- Then consider Fairbairn’s analysis of Matthew 1:22-23 (p. 456). What is the problem in this text for an exegete with evangelical presuppositions? How does Fairbairn resolve the problem?
- Give your analysis of Fairbairn’s analysis.
- Now analyze the “allegory” in Galatians 4:24 in light of Fairbairn’s principles. Fairbairn himself does not analyze this text, so you may seek out other sources to guide you (as here, p. 261ff). Be sure to make clear how you would resolve the above named issue (#1).
12 hours
15% of final grade.
10 hours
15% of final grade.
God’s Word tells us that we have the capacity to know God since we’ve been created in the image of God. Though that capacity has been radically corrupted through the fall, when God works in grace, he principally and gradually restores it by his Spirit, as the Spirit reshapes us after the image of Christ. Thus by grace in Jesus Christ, and through the illuminating work of God’s Holy Spirit, we can once again know God and his glory, know truth, know each other, and know everything we need to know to live to the glory of God.
God uses His self-revelation in the twin books of nature and His Word to that end. For us fallen creatures the Scriptures are the only path towards true knowledge. The Scriptures are the Word of God, infallibly down to the very words. The Word of God is the touchstone of truth. Thus we must have a thorough-going disposition of teachability, in order to receive this Word of God, its content, and come under its claim.
The Connectivity of Knowledge
God’s Word also tells us that alongside our capacity for knowledge, we have the capacity for righteousness and holiness. We can distinguish these capacities, but we cannot separate them. Right knowledge tends to righteousness and holiness, just as righteousness and holiness are based on true knowledge. Knowledge that does not tend towards righteousness and holiness is false or formal knowledge, and destructive. Accordingly, I teach knowledge with an eye to show the connectivity of knowledge to practice and piety.
The Components of Knowledge
As I teach any subject – whether exegesis, hermeneutics, biblical theology, etc.—I’m aiming that the student makes fundamental gains in:
1. Discerning the Relevance of the subject;
2. Grasping the Content of the subject;
3. Accessing the Sources of the subject;
4. Practicing the Skills related to the subject;
5. Pursuing the Implications flowing from the subject;
6. Engaging the Debates involved in the subject; and
7. Radiating a Passion fitting the subject.

